Teaching history:developing

     Tonight I got the sense of what it means to teach history to our children.
     Some say that teaching history prevents us from repeating it while others teach that teaching history makes us doom to repeat it.
     If we resonate with that which we focus on, then those who teach that studying history makes us doom to repeat it are correct.
    If we do not resonate with what we are observing, then it is taught we would not be doomed to repeat it.
   As children we are born blank slates in residual DNA.
    The blank slate creates a resonance, making DNA irrelevant. If one was to place a European ancestry child in a wilderness with no teachings, that child would resonate with that wilderness knowing it's self as nothing but Indigenous.
     Instead, it is required by law that we teach our children history. While being taught history, these children are taught to self-identify with that history. The blank slate is thus painted over with identification with either perpetrator or victim according to skin.
     In observer mode one does not identify with race and can indeed learn from history. Such a one gains perspective in the mind which validates intuition/inner knowing/soul/oneness
    In the case of one in observer mode, race is irrelevant except for coming to understand the whys and hows of separation. .We come to understand the differences of perspectives. We come to understand that what is considered a privilege for one race is is a deprivation and thus resentment/weakness of another race.
      There are so many implications.............some will get the sense of them, others will need instruction.......and so it is in developement/in need of a spelling out....as I breath it all in and breathe it all out......