Human the karmic result of plants?

      I do not idealize nature like many others in the "love and light" movement. Adore it, yes. Recognize it as the source of my physical being/Mother, yes. But I also see how much like nature humanity actually is. It began with people protesting the building of dams. Beavers do it. They create marshes where there was just a stream, drowning out plants and neighbors, destroying an ecosystem and creating another. In watching "Earthlings" the narrator idealizes plants. No. There are plenty of "invasive" plant species and yes, plants DO compete for sunlight: is it not why they grow quickly and crooked and spread their branches wide, depriving lower growing plants of light?
     So what if history of our planet went something like this: certain plants grew out of their place, threatening others. Plant eaters came as a "karmic" response to those. Predators came as a "karmic" response to plant eaters and humans as "karmic" response to predators.
     Research has shown that reproduction decreases when a species does not feel threatened. That means "overpopulation" is a problem of a species not feeling safe. Hunger is also a fear-based response. It is surprising how few vegetables it takes to sustain a human body who chooses to live without "consuming fear". Breathairians are becoming more common as human beings become more "enlightened".
    Carnivorous animals can be raised and live on a vegan diet. Who is to say they also cannot become "breathairians"?.
    The one thing I DO know: human beings are capable of rising above "karma" and "Law of Attraction". We do it with love, acceptance and allowance. That includes the allowance of the perishing from our experience of that which chooses not to follow. At some point one has to make a "clinical" choice, separating one's self at any apparent cost from that which simply will not follow.