Adding value

Woke this morning with a very clear perception:
If we're trying to effectively sell someone on a product, we have to be convinced of its value.
Isn't that the same with my own self perceived value?
If I want my presence to be valued, I must hold it up as having the highest of values. Never in competition with anyone else's, still of the highest. I pick and choose who has the privilege of my presence because it is of the highest value.
Not worrying about the pendulum swinging too far into the opposite, I need to come out of false humility and self flagration "to keep me 'humble' " (which is usually lying about our value so we don't apear too great, make people jealous or feel less than. Humility is honest expression of our qualities)
We cannot add value to another except that we can only first facilitate their own perception of their value, which we can only do if we hold ourselves at a very high value.
That's my assignment for self: allow myself to perceive and be perceived as being of high value.

Churches are pushing the negative results that will come from the automation and A.I. revolution with their persistent sin of devaluing being human by their insistence that we are all unworthy, imperfect beings helpless against our evil flesh.
It is only seeing the value of being in human flesh that we will value ourselves and be capable of extending that value to our view of others. With recognition of our intrinsic value, we accept U.B.I comfortably and transition easily to the obsoletion of jobs.

To "sin" is "to miss the point of what it means to be human". It is in our body we find our humanity and the point of our existence.

I asked that same question of individuals who are supposed to be specialists preventing abuse: if I let you in despite my "no" when I teach my children that "no" means "no", how do I explain this to them?

Richard Wilkins

January 13 at 11:46 PM

“How can I tell people to value themselves if I allow people to treat me badly”

Wiz x